Peru's Election and Its Mining Industry

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack

Kopin Tan wrote Messy Mañana for Miners (subscription required) in Barron's Magazine.

One of my key stock holdings Pan American Silver Corp. was featured in the story as a company that has the potential to be adversely affected by the nationalistic tendencies in South America, and Peru in particular.

Nationalism is to South America what eyebrow-shaping is to men -- a troubling recent trend -- and Venezuela and Bolivia have already pushed to reclaim oil-and-gas assets. Peru is the world's second-biggest producer of silver, third-biggest producer of zinc and fourth-biggest producer of copper; it accounts for 40% of sales at Denver-based Newmont Mining (ticker: NEM) and about 67% of sales at Pan American Silver (PAAS).

No surprise, then, to see increased hedging of stocks with Peruvian exposure, though some likely has been driven as well by the recent pullback in metals stocks. Option prices and projected volatility have risen noticeably in Newmont, Pan American, Barrick Gold (ABX) and Southern Copper (PCU). In Newmont's case, for instance, traders have accumulated 0.94 puts for every call outstanding, the highest ratio in a year.

Potential fallout may prove less than election rhetoric suggests, and even Señors Garcia and Humala both must realize the importance of foreign investment. But analysts at the very least expect international mining companies to owe increased royalties and face greater pressure to share more of their profits. Nor should short-term risks be underestimated, as news headlines and post-election chest-thumping could keep stocks volatile.

I have been surprised by the low valuation given to Pan American in light of the still strong silver price at nearly $13 per ounce. But uncertainty does take a toll on valuation.

As the article suggests, some might have shorted Pan American with a long in iShares Silver Trust (SLV). If Peru nationalizes or increases taxes against Pan American Silver and other companies, silver production, in time, would likely be adversely affected and thus silver prices would likely rise. If this situation were to play out, Pan American would go down or stay stable, but iShares Silver Trust should increase.

Given that the leading contender Garcia is not a big fan of Chavez, I am not nearly so certain that he would increase taxes aggressively. And he certainly would not nationalize mining companies. Thus, I think the negativism might be overdone.

As a matter of disclosure, I remain long Pan American Silver shares.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://speciousargument.com/cgi-bin/khsmt424/mt-tb.cgi/275

I agree with Adam in his Mine Over Matter article concerning Pan American Silver Corp PAAS and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). It just strikes me as a classic "buy the rumor, sell the news" setup. Miner shares in both gold... Read More

Leave a comment

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Chromasia

chromasia photoshop tutorials

Google Adsense

Amazon Recommend Business I

Amazon Recommend Photography I

Amazon Recommend General I

pair Networks

Powered by Movable Type 4.24-en

Contact

Email Subscription

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Flickr

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Stecyk. Make your own badge here.

Google Adsense

Amazon

Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha Certified

Answer Tips

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Stecyk published on May 27, 2006 7:40 PM.

Bolivia's Evo Morales and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez was the previous entry in this blog.

Agree With Adam's Mine Over Matter is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.